In a major political development, FBI Raids the Maryland home of former National Security Advisor John Bolton early Friday morning. The operation, linked to a classified documents investigation, has sparked fresh controversy as Bolton simultaneously took a swipe at former President Donald Trump on social media.
Bolton, who served under Trump from 2018 to 2019 before a bitter fallout, was not arrested during the raid. The FBI also searched his Washington, D.C., office as part of the same probe, removing multiple boxes of material.
Key Highlights of the Raid
The FBI raid took place on August 22, 2025, at Bolton’s Bethesda home around 7:00 AM Eastern Time. Agents also entered his D.C. office, removing boxes and bags as part of a classified documents probe.
At nearly the same time, Bolton was active on social media, posting a comment about the Russia-Ukraine conflict and criticizing Trump’s peace initiatives. Meanwhile, FBI Director Kash Patel made a firm statement online, declaring “No one is above the law,” while Deputy Director Dan Bongino reinforced the agency’s stance against corruption.
ALSO READ: Trump and Vance Clash with Zelenskyy Over U.S. Support for Ukraine
Bolton’s Social Media Post Amid FBI Raid
Interestingly, while FBI agents carried out the search, Bolton appeared to focus on international politics. At 7:32 AM, he posted on X about Russia’s ongoing war with Ukraine, criticizing Trump’s peace efforts and suggesting the former president’s talks with Moscow were driven by personal ambition for a Nobel Prize.

The timing of Bolton’s post highlighted his attempt to steer attention away from the raid, even as federal agents removed materials from his residence.
FBI’s Official Stance
FBI Director Kash Patel emphasized in a 7:03 AM post that “No one is above the law,” without naming Bolton directly. His deputy, Dan Bongino, reinforced the message by stating that public corruption and security breaches will not be tolerated.
The strong remarks underscored the seriousness of the operation and the Justice Department’s commitment to classified materials security, especially after years of political scrutiny over handling of sensitive documents.
Bolton’s History with Trump
Bolton, a veteran diplomat who also served as U.N. Ambassador under President George W. Bush, had a turbulent relationship with Trump. He was ousted in 2019 after disagreements on foreign policy, particularly regarding North Korea and Afghanistan.
Since then, Trump has repeatedly ridiculed Bolton, calling him “one of the dumbest people in government” and accusing him of warmongering. Bolton, in return, has publicly questioned Trump’s competence and criticized his leadership style, claiming the former president lacked guiding principles beyond self-interest.
Searches Beyond the Home
In addition to Bolton’s Maryland residence, FBI agents were seen at his Washington, D.C. office. Boxes and bags were removed as part of the ongoing probe. Sources suggest investigators are looking for classified material that Bolton may have retained after leaving office.

The scale of the raid shows investigators are taking the matter seriously, though officials have not disclosed what was found inside the seized boxes.
Pros and Cons of the Situation
From a legal standpoint, the raid demonstrates accountability and reinforces the principle that no official, current or former, is exempt from scrutiny. It strengthens institutional credibility but also deepens political tensions.
For Bolton, the downside is reputational damage. Even if no charges are filed, the image of federal agents searching his home undermines his public standing. On the other hand, his quick pivot to international commentary on X shows his determination to remain relevant in policy debates.
Conclusion
The FBI’s raid on John Bolton’s home signals another high-profile case in the ongoing debate about how former officials handle classified materials. While no arrests have been made, the probe is still in motion. Bolton’s public criticism of Trump amid the raid suggests this story will continue to develop, especially given the personal and political history between the two.